Rep. Cutler: Separating Fact From Fiction On Parkland Transfer Legislation
|
Rep. Bryan Cutler (R-Lancaster), prime sponsor of House Bill 2224 which would change the procedures for the sale of local parkland issued this statement on the legislation. (The legislation died in the Senate after the General Assembly adjourned for the year.) Rep. Cutler said-- “Please allow me to set the record straight on my land transfer legislation. My purpose for authoring House Bill 2224 was to allow municipalities the opportunity to sell properties that are not deed restricted or otherwise dedicated for public use. “Due to a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in re: Erie Golf Course, the court expressed its need for clarification regarding the legislative intent of this decades-old law. House Bill 2224 was written to clarify the terms surrounding the dedication and deed restrictions found in the act. “Unfortunately, some individuals and groups are saying this legislation would allow for the “secret sale” of any park in the Commonwealth. This simply is not true. Most parks are appropriately protected and will not be impacted by this change. If a park has been properly deed restricted or dedicated for public use, it will continue to be protected. In such cases, a municipality will still need court approval prior to selling this land. “Other individuals have misapplied the framework of this bill, saying it applies to agricultural or conservation easements, Project 70 Land Restrictions, and condemned land. Again, this is not true. Specific statutes will continue to dictate how these types of lands are handled. “My bill would only impact land purchased by a municipality that is not deed restricted or dedicated for public use. The number of properties impacted would likely be very small. Additionally, selling public land would still be an entirely public process. Prior to selling the land, the municipality would be required to follow the applicable municipal code, including advertising and bidding. “I recognize the concerns about the possibility of a park that was never properly dedicated or deed restricted, but I also believe this will be a small minority of cases. In an effort to avoid this scenario, one of the changes we are considering is to allow a window of time where titles could be reviewed and, if necessary, updated to reflect the original purpose of the conveyance. “We will continue looking for possible changes to work toward a resolution in which municipalities can more easily sell non-deed-restricted assets, while also protecting the significant investment of our citizens into various land programs. “If this legislation is not adopted into law, the only real winners will be the municipal lawyers, who stand to reap the benefits at the taxpayers’ expense.” Reaction The PA Land Trust Association, the Growing Greener Coalition and the PA Recreation & Parks Society Friday thanked the state Senate for halting House Bill 2224 – otherwise known as the parks-for-cash bill. “The Senate should be applauded for recognizing the serious unintended threats that the bill presented to our local parks and open spaces,” said Andrew M. Loza, executive director of the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. “Looking ahead, the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association and other park supporters would be happy to sit down with our lawmakers to craft legislation that would improve the process for disposing of lands lacking a public purpose without threatening parks.” “The Pennsylvania Recreation & Parks Society thanks the Senate for putting the brakes on the parks-for-cash bill,” said Karen Burke-Crawford, executive director of the Pennsylvania Recreation & Parks Society. “We appreciate that our Senators recognized the concerns of the public and decided that there needs to be a more careful approach to the legislation.” “The Pennsylvania Growing Greener Coalition is pleased that the Senate took a step back to listen to and understand the serious questions raised by the conservation and recreation community,” said Heath. “We look forward to working with our legislators to come up with a new plan that meets the needs of our counties and municipalities, while also protecting our parks, trails and other open spaces that our communities cherish.” |
10/22/2012 |
Go To Preceding Article Go To Next Article |