Commonwealth Court Thursday concluded Cumberland County court did not err in September of 2015 when it overruled the objections of several property owners to condemnation of their property by Sunoco to build the Mariner East II pipeline.

Two dissenting opinions were filed with the decision.

The landowners appealed the ruling saying the Mariner East 2 pipeline was an intrastate not an interstate pipeline and was subject to regulation by the Public Utility Commission and there was not public need for the pipeline.

A copy of the majority and dissenting opinions are available online.

NewsClips:

Court Hands Landowners Defeat In Sunoco Pipeline Eminent Domain Case

Court Upholds Eminent Domain In Sunoco Pipeline Case

Court Sides With Sunoco Pipeline On Utility Status

Court: Sunoco Can Take Private Property For Pipeline

Appeals Court Won’t Axe Sunoco Pipeline Condemnation

AP: Sunoco Clears 1 Legal Hurdle After Pipeline Ruling

Crable: 2nd Federal Agency Expresses Concern Over Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline

Columbia Gas Opens Training Center In Beaver County

$10 Million Loss At Delco Refinery Is Cyclical

Court Told NY Can’t Veto FERC’s Constitution Pipeline OK

Related Story:

DEP Sets 5 Public Hearings On Proposed Mariner East II Natural Gas Pipeline

7/18/2016