| Share this: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Now Proposing Bi-Directional Laurel Pipeline Service
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P. Friday announced it is actively undertaking the steps necessary to provide bi-directional service along the Altoona to Pittsburgh section of the refined fuels pipeline system operated by its operating subsidiary, Laurel Pipe Line Company, L.P.. This service, which Buckeye believes will not materially impact its original project costs or timeline, will leave all of Laurel’s existing Public Utility Commission tariffs in place while establishing new Federal Regulatory Energy Commission tariffs from Midwest origins to Altoona, PA destinations. Buckeye’s decision comes in light of the recent recommended decision by the PUC’s Administrative Law Judge that the PUC reject Laurel’s application to abandon east-to-west transportation and reverse the direction of service in that section of the Laurel pipeline from west to east. “Buckeye fully respects and remains committed to the ongoing PUC process. We see the addition of eastbound service to the current westbound capability as providing an operational solution for all our customers. This approach provides shippers and suppliers with the choice to supply from either the west or east, while still increasing Pennsylvania consumers’ access to more affordable, lower cost North American- manufactured fuels, and we think it does so in a way that fully addresses the points raised in the recent PUC proceedings,” said Robert A. Malecky, Buckeye’s President, Domestic Pipelines & Terminals. No other details were available. Reaction The group of businesses opposed to the original flow reversal proposal-- the Deny Buckeye Coalition-- issued this statement on the proposal-- “We don’t have details, but we’re certainly suspicious of this decision. After over a year of telling the PUC, legislators, media and the public that a reversal is best for Pennsylvania, Buckeye is now trying to take unilateral action that appears to be circumventing the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission process. Truly embracing bi-directional flow that meets the needs of Buckeye’s current customers — and being open to competition — are contrary to their position for the past 12-18 months. We look forward to hearing more about their plans before taking an official position.” Deny Buckeye members include: Giant Eagle Get Go, Gulf, Guttman Energy, Monroe Energy, Philadelphia Energy Solutions and Sheetz. NewsClips: Legere: After Setback, Laurel Pipeline Company Plans 2-Way Flow Maykuth: Mariner East 2 Pipeline Offers To Temporarily Relocate Residents Affected By Sinkholes AP: Mariner East 2 Pipeline Offers To Relocate Residents Affected By Sinkholes Near Philly Maykuth: How Sunoco’s Drilling Methods May Be Causing Mariner East 2 Pipeline’s Problems Mariner East 2 Pipeline Faulted For Unauthorized Form Of Drilling, Spill In Lebanon County Hurdle: Sunoco: Vandals Damage Mariner East 2 Pipeline Equipment In Chester County FracTracker: Shell Pipeline, Not Quite The Good Neighbor Energy Transfer Partners/Sunoco Pipeline Data System Hit With Cyber Attack Nearly 100 People Attend Public Hearing On Proposed Shell Pipeline Most Residents At Monaca Hearing Question Shell’s Planned Pipeline Residents Ask Whether The Proposed Shell Ethane Pipeline Is An Acceptable Risk Mariner East 1 Pipeline Shutdown Piles On Propane Price Pressure Related Story: Administrative Law Judge Recommends PUC Deny Request To Reverse Flow Of Laurel Pipeline [Posted: April 6, 2018] |
|
|
4/9/2018 |
|
| Go To Preceding Article Go To Next Article |
