Coalition Of Businesses Oppose Latest Plan To Make Laurel Pipeline Bi-Directional
|
|
On April 23, a coalition of businesses filed a formal protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in position to Buckeye Pipeline's request to make the Laurel Pipeline bi-directional from Altoona to Pittsburgh. Buckeye had earlier proposed to make the pipeline, which now flows from east to west, only flow from west to east, cutting off the Pittsburgh market from Philadelphia Area refineries. Members of the coalition include Giant Eagle, Inc.; Guttman Energy, Inc; Lucknow-Highspire Terminals, LLC (a Gulf Oil affiliate); Monroe Energy, LLC; Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing, LLC; and Sheetz, Inc. Under the proposed “bi-directional” service proposal now in front of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Buckeye would push fuel from the Midwest into Western Pennsylvania at higher tariff rates, thereby benefiting Midwest refineries and, at times, preventing lower-priced fuels from the East Coast from reaching Western Pennsylvania. Buckeye is attempting to move forward under the same full reversal agreements with Midwest refiners that were in place when the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission rejected the full reversal proposal in 2018. In fact, Buckeye is still fighting for full reversal through an appeal of the PUC’s decision to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Buckeye’s ultimate goal remains to limit or completely cut off Western Pennsylvania from accessing gasoline manufactured on the East Coast, which is cheaper the majority of the year, according to the coalition. Click Here for a copy of the protest. Questions about the coalition’s action should be directed to David La Torre by sending email to: david@latorrecommunications.com. (Map: Original Buckeye flow reversal plan.) NewsClips: O’Reilly: Sheetz, Others Protest Proposed Change In Flow For Laurel Pipeline Hurdle: Sinkhole Opens Up Along Mariner East 2 Pipeline Route In Delaware County Huge Sinkhole Forms Along Mariner East 2 Pipeline Route Editorial: Mariner East 2 Pipeline Construction Restarted In Delaware County Phillips: Southeast Senators Seek Answers From DEP Over Mariner East Pipelines Hurdle: Sunoco To Restart Mariner East 1 Pipeline After Agreeing To New Safety Measures Legere: Mariner East 1 Pipeline Set To Restart After Sinkhole Caused Shutdown Maykuth: Sunoco’s Mariner East 1 Pipeline Now Back In Service Again Controversial Sunoco Mariner East 1 Pipeline Will Resume Operations Op-Ed: Pipelines: Let’s Keep Our Eye On The Ball AP-Litvak: Drilling Wastewater Pipelines A Big, Unregulated Business Litvak: Underground Drilling Wastewater Pipelines Can Be A Big, Unregulated Business In PA NJ Finds 9 Potential Historic Sites In PennEast Pipeline’s Path Related Stories This Week: PUC Refuses Sunoco Request To Resume Construction Of Mariner East 2 Pipeline In Chester County PUC Investigating Subsidence Near Sunoco Mariner East 2 Bypass Pipeline In Delaware County Sen. Dinniman, 4 Other Senators Ask For Postponement Of Reconfirmation Hearing On DEP Secretary Related Stories: PUC Unanimously Denies Request To Reverse Flow Of Buckeye Laurel Pipeline Gasoline Suppliers, Refiners Object To Bi-Directional Flow Proposal For Laurel Pipeline [Posted: April 24, 2019] |
|
4/29/2019 |
|
Go To Preceding Article Go To Next Article |