Scrapbook Photo 11/25/24 - 156 New Stories - REAL Environmental & Conservation Leadership In PA: http://tinyurl.com/54ukts8z
Auditor General DePasquale: State’s Unfocused Efforts On Climate Change Crisis Risks Lives, Cost Taxpayers $261 Million In 2018 Alone
Photo

On November 13, Auditor General Eugene DePasquale said Pennsylvania must proactively plan for the changing climate, a problem that already threatens public safety and drives significant new costs for taxpayers during his announcement of a special report-- Climate Crisis: The Rising Cost Of Inaction.

“The longer we fail to act, the greater the risks to our environment, our economy and our future,” DePasquale said. “Climate change is a challenge that also presents an opportunity: by acting and investing now, we can not only save lives but also protect our economy and create jobs along the way.”

According to the U.S. Global Change Research Program, made up of 13 federal agencies, Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization.

A major report issued by the program late last year details threats to public health and safety from extreme heat and flooding; concerns about severe weather impacts on aging power, water, sewer and transportation systems; and the impact of altered ecosystems on rural communities, farming, forestry and tourism.

DePasquale’s special report, “Climate Crisis: The Rising Cost of Inaction,” noted that severe weather is already costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars a year and that state government needs to do more to mitigate future impacts.

“My team and I documented at least $261 million in climate-related costs to Pennsylvania in 2018 alone in this report,” DePasquale said. “Half of that amount, $125.7 million, was in infrastructure damage statewide caused by record-breaking floods and landslides.”

Other projected costs of climate change include:

-- Millions of dollars to equip public school buildings with air conditioning because of increased heat waves;

-- Changes in growing zones and seasons, plus increasing numbers and varieties of pests, that will impact food availability and costs; and

-- A rise in sea levels that will impact major shipping and transportation hubs, including Philadelphia International Airport.

“What concerns me most are the potential impacts that we can’t yet see, driving new costs that will increasingly strain state and municipal budgets.” DePasquale said. “It’s difficult for most people to fathom the magnitude of the problems that lie ahead – which only makes the planning process even more challenging.”

Observations/Recommendations

DePasquale held public hearings in Pittsburgh, State College and Harrisburg as part of developing his special report, which contains three observations and nine recommendations--

-- Observation 1: Local and state leaders are struggling to plan for extreme weather and other climate change impacts due to a lack of coordination and inadequate resources.

“Though some plans exist at the state, county and municipal levels, there needs to be more leadership and coordination at the state level,” DePasquale said. “As a state, we can and must do better.”

The report notes that communities are flooding that had not flooded before, but the state is not prioritizing action or funding to mitigate the risks to people and property. One example of this problem is a lack of dedicated funding to upgrade or replace dangerously outdated municipal sewer systems.

“Pennsylvania’s sewer systems are among the oldest in the nation,” DePasquale said. “Not only are those systems ill-suited to handle heavier rainfalls that cause increased flooding, some also release untreated sewage into the same rivers that supply drinking water to millions of people.”

Proper planning for increasingly severe weather and developing climate-resilient infrastructure will actually create family-sustaining jobs in industries such as construction and civil engineering.

-- Observation 2: Pennsylvania is not prepared for the severe impacts of climate change, and taking a solely reactive approach will lead to millions of dollars spent on recovery and remediation.

The report notes that, according to the National Institute of Building Sciences, every $1 spent on natural disaster mitigation saves $6 in recovery costs. However, because many people incorrectly believe that federal disaster assistance is always available, too little attention is paid to making proactive investments in mitigation.

“The federal government cannot, and will not, bail us out after every severe storm,” DePasquale said. “In fact, the Federal Emergency Management Agency declined to cover $63 million in damage to public infrastructure across Pennsylvania last year.”

Pennsylvania’s homes and businesses are underinsured against flooding that will continue to increase in frequency and severity. Only 15 percent of property owners who should purchase flood insurance actually obtain it, and that share is decreasing.

In addition, communities often underestimate their risk of flooding because the tools available to them do not yet account for changing weather patterns.

-- Observation 3: Pennsylvania must join other states in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide and methane, in the electricity, transportation, industrial and agricultural sectors.

“Nearly 90 percent of Pennsylvania’s greenhouse gases – which drive climate change – come from those four sectors,” DePasquale said. “Yet, there is virtually no coordinated effort to reduce emissions in three of the sectors: transportation, industry and agriculture.”

DePasquale noted that aside from a decrease in emissions from the electric power sector that resulted from transitioning electric generation largely from coal to natural gas, no real other reductions have been made.

“Because of Pennsylvania’s major role in energy production, we have a responsibility to be a leader among states – not a follower,” DePasquale said.  “As a state, we are the fourth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, and we have very few plans to help us improve that ranking.”

The report’s 9 recommendations are as follows:

-- The governor should expand the GreenGov Council into a climate hub to improve coordination, especially among the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), state leaders, county leaders and local leaders to encourage and facilitate climate action at all levels of government.

-- DEP should improve upon its public awareness campaign that educates citizens on what they can do to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and participate in climate action on the local, county and state levels.

-- DEP should develop and follow implementation measures for its Climate Action Plan to help Pennsylvania stakeholders learn how they can effect change.

-- The governor should include in his 2020-21 budget a funding increase for all state agencies – including DEP, PEMA, PennDOT, DCNR and DGS – that are involved in planning for and reacting to severe weather and other climate change effects.

-- The governor and General Assembly should prioritize proactive planning at all levels by:

     -- Fully funding applicable state agencies to lead this effort,

     -- Harmonizing regulations currently in place,

     -- Improving outreach and education to counties; and

     -- Implementing statewide planning, including an updated state water plan, a statewide land use plan, and guidance to implement these plans.

     -- The General Assembly should create a resiliency fund that PennDOT and other state agencies could draw from to pay for natural disaster clean-up that is not funded by federal or other state sources.

     -- DEP should take comprehensive and timely steps to measure and regulate methane emissions from the oil and gas sector.

     -- The General Assembly and DEP should offer incentives to improve electric vehicle usage, sales and infrastructure in the state through targeted investments and consumer education.

     -- The Department of Agriculture should better engage with the state’s agriculture sector to develop and release a plan of action for climate change, including best practices to reduce emissions and to improve resiliency. 

Click Here for a copy of the full report.

Visit DEP’s Climate Change webpage and DCNR’s Addressing Climate Change on Public Lands webpage to learn more about what Pennsylvania is doing to deal with climate change impacts.

NewsClips:

275+ PA Environment & Energy NewsClips Are Waiting Here For You To Read Them

Related Articles This Week:

Senate Appropriations Meets Nov. 18 To Consider Clean Vehicle Infrastructure Bill

Briefing: Positive, Bipartisan Environmental, Energy Bills The House & Senate Can Pass Before The End Of 2019

PA Energy Development Authority Issues Energy Plan Setting Financial, Technical Priorities

PA Conservative Energy Forum Clean & Renewable Energy Symposium Dec. 9-10 In Harrisburg

Dec. 3 Workshop On Performance Excellence In Electricity Rating Program For Green Buildings In Harrisburg

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Report: Climate Change Is No Longer A Distant Threat For Farmers, It’s Here

Nearly $1.3 Million In Agriculture Research Funding Awarded For Building Soil Health, Dealing With Invasive Plants, Spotted Lanternfly, Promoting Pollinator Habitat, Climate Change Impacts

Related Articles:

Gov. Wolf Issues Executive Order Directing DEP To Join Regional Initiative To Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Power Plants

Gov. Wolf Sets Goal Of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions By 80% By 2050 From 2005 Levels

DEP Secretary McDonnell: The Time For Action On Climate Change Is Now - And The People Of Pennsylvania Know It

Gov. Wolf, Legislators Announce New Climate Action Plan, Including Endorsing Cap-And-Trade For Power Generation, Keeping Nuclear Power Plants Open
Senate, House Lawmakers From Both Parties Call On Wolf To Move Oil & Gas Methane Emission Reduction Rules Without Delay

PA, Regional Transportation & Climate Initiative Makes Draft Policy Framework Available For Comment

New Report: Clean Energy Jobs Grew To 90,772 In Pennsylvania In 2018

4th National Climate Assessment: Climate Change Is Human Caused; Flooding, Wildfires, Health Impacts, Infrastructure, Economic Damage Will Increase Without Action

71% Increase In Very Heavy Precipitation Events In Last 54 Years In PA: Learn How To Prepare For Emergencies - 30 Days/30 Ways

New Poll Finds 79% Of Pennsylvania Voters Support Limits On Carbon Pollution From Power Plants

[Posted: November 13, 2019]


11/18/2019

Go To Preceding Article     Go To Next Article

Return to This PA Environment Digest's Main Page