By Jeff Mulhollem, Penn State News

Allowing farmers to harvest vegetation from their riparian buffers will not significantly impede the ability of those streamside tracts to protect water quality by capturing nutrients and sediment-- and it will boost farmers’ willingness to establish buffers.

That is the conclusion of Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences researchers, who compared the impacts of six riparian buffer design scenarios over two, four-year crop rotations in two small central and southeastern Pennsylvania watersheds.

Two of the buffer scenarios included the harvesting of switchgrass and swamp willow trees.

Allowing farmers to harvest vegetation from their riparian buffers and sell it for biofuels-- not permitted under current Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, or CREP, federal regulations-- would go a long way toward persuading farmers to establish riparian buffers, researchers contend.

And farmers’ buy-in is badly needed in Pennsylvania, where hundreds of miles of new buffers are needed along streams emptying into the Chesapeake Bay to help the state meet water-quality standards.

“This is the first long-term study in the Chesapeake Bay watershed to model how harvesting vegetation affects riparian buffer performance over the full length of a buffer contract,” said researcher Heather Preisendanz, associate professor of agricultural and biological engineering. “Allowing harvesting of the buffer vegetation — either trees or grasses — minimally impacted water quality, with only slight annual average reductions in the capture of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment.” 

In addition, she noted, under the highest input loading conditions-- heavy runoff after storms-- buffers with lower removal efficiencies removed more total mass of pollutants than did buffers with high-removal efficiencies, if they were between streams and fields with row crops such as corn and soybeans.

The location of the buffer was most important.

The researchers, who modeled runoff and resulting pollution from agricultural fields reaching the streams, studied riparian buffer performance on Spring Creek in Centre County and Conewago Creek in Lancaster County.

Buffer design scenarios studied included 35-feet-wide grass; 50-feet-wide grass; 50-feet-wide deciduous trees; 100-feet-wide grass and trees; 100-feet-wide grass and trees, with trees harvested every three years; and 100-feet-wide grass and trees, with grass harvested every year.

The research team developed these scenarios after considering feedback from focus group meetings with farmers in the two watersheds. Farmers indicated they wanted to be able to install buffers tailored to their properties with the prospect of generating limited revenue.

In the Spring Creek watershed-- which has been studied closely by Penn State agricultural scientists for decades-- 16 years of daily-scale nutrient and sediment loads from three crop rotations and two soils were simulated in a soil and water assessment tool.

That data was used as an input to a riparian ecosystem management model used nationally to better understand how a buffer's effectiveness changes as a function of input load, buffer design and buffer management.

The simulation results, recently published in the Journal of Environmental Quality, suggest that for buffers of the same width, the farmer-preferred grass vegetation outperformed policy-preferred vegetation of trees for sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus removal.

The findings of the research have important implications for informing flexible buffer design policies and enhanced placement of buffers in watersheds impaired by nutrient and sediment, Preisendanz explained.

She pointed out, however, that more research may be needed to examine tradeoffs between water-quality impacts and other ecosystem services, such as streambank stabilization, habitat and stream shading.

“If incorporated into policy, these findings could remove one barrier to farmer adoption of riparian buffers,” she said. “Based on our conversations with famers in focus groups, we think this approach — government being more flexible with buffer designs and allowing harvesting — would go a long way toward farmers agreeing to create more riparian buffers.”

The state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources currently is promoting “multifunctional” buffers, Preisendanz added. “Our hope is that this work will help to inform tradeoffs of flexible buffer designs and management options in this new program.”

Fei Jiang, now a postdoctoral scholar in entomology, then a graduate student in soil science, led the research. Also participating in the study were Cibin Raj, assistant professor of agricultural and biological engineering, and Patrick Drohan, associate professor of pedology, both at Penn State; and Tamie Veith, agricultural engineer with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture supported this research.

[To learn more about buffers and available assistance, visit the DCNR Forest Buffers Along Waterways webpage.

[Grants Available

[DEP is accepting applications for EPA Section 319 Watershed Restoration Grants until October 23.  Click Here for all the details.

[Department of Agriculture Farm Conservation Excellence Grants are available for Lancaster and York Counties.  Learn more here.

[Contact your local county conservation district for landowner financial and technical assistance options.  Find your district.

[Apply now for U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service landowner assistance in designing and funding farm conservation projects.  Click Here for more.

[Need funding for a park, trail, riparian buffer or conservation project? The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Recreation and Conservation is hosting virtual regional grant workshops in November.  Click Here for all the details.

[The DCNR website includes information about the Community Conservation Partnerships Program grants]

(Reprinted from Penn State News.)

Related Articles This Week:

-- DCNR Invests $2.85 Million In 22 Rivers Conservation, Boating, Fishing Access, Streamside Buffers Projects

-- Lancaster Clean Water Partners Announce $128,000 In Grants To Support Implementation of Countywide Clean Water Plan

-- U.S. House Passes Bill To Reauthorize Chesapeake Bay, Wildlife Programs, Bill Now On President’s Desk

-- EPA, Agriculture Formalize Joint Support For Healthy Farms, Clean Water, Future Food Security At Lancaster County Farm

-- CBF Offering 6 Live Online Classes To Empower Volunteer VoiCeS In PA To Advocate For Clean Water

-- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Launches Live Online Environmental Education Program-- OWL

-- CBF Oct. 7 Webinar: How To Ditch Fertilizers, Weed Killers And Make Your Lawn Environmentally Friendly

-- PA Organizations For Watersheds & Rivers Hosts Geology Of PA Streams Webinar Oct. 21

-- Pike Conservation District Holds Virtual Road Maintenance Workshop Oct. 28

-- Audubon Society Of Western PA Hosts Online Buffalo Creek Watershed Riparian Buffer Workshops With Free Trees In Armstrong, Butler Counties

-- Bucknell University 15th Annual River Symposium Call For Presentation Proposals

-- 2021 Delaware Estuary Science & Environmental Summit Call For Presentation Proposals

-- U.S.G.S. Pennsylvania Water Science Center Upgrades StreamStats Information

-- Brodhead Watershed Assn. Welcomes Kelly Gallo As New Executive Director

[Posted: October 3, 2020]

10/5/2020