Court Throws Out Challenge to Deer Case, Audubon Supports Open Process

Game Commission this week hailed a Commonwealth Court ruling that dismissed, with prejudice, the Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania's challenge to the agency's deer management program. The decision to throw out the case was made "with prejudice," meaning that the lawsuit may not be re-filed.

A spokesperson for the sportsmen’s group said they would likely appeal this decision.

"Today's court ruling is a strong statement that the Game Commission's deer management program is being conducted in a sound, methodical and scientific manner," said Carl Roe, Executive Director of the Commission. "We believe that most hunters and the general public recognize that the need to reduce and stabilize our state's deer herd is a short-term pain that we must endure in order to achieve long-term gains.

"Our hope is that this ruling will cease the unnecessary expenditure of sportsmen's dollars and tax dollars fighting frivolous and ill-conceived lawsuits."

“The ruling is not an endorsement of either the Unified position or the scientific validity of the Game Commission’s current deer management program. Rather, it simply states that the courts are not a place to settle policy disagreements,” said Dr. Timothy Schaeffer, Executive Director of Audubon PA. “The best way to judge the effectiveness of deer management or any other public policy is to have an open system, in which the data used by resource mangers to make their decisions are subject to public scrutiny and peer review.” Link: Audubon Deer and Habitat Report

Roe noted that, since 2000, the Game Commission has worked to implement a deer management program that takes into account the concerns of all Pennsylvanians, and the agency has been consistent and open in its approach.

"The deer management plan, which is available on our website, was developed with public input to improve the health of the state's deer herd; to encourage healthy habitat, which deer and all other wildlife depend on; and to reduce deer-human conflicts," Roe said. "We believe this deer management program will improve the health of our deer herd and the habitat that supports it and other wildlife.

"Yes, hunting has become more challenging in many areas. However, the benefits from our program changes are unmistakable, as hunters have reported seeing and harvesting larger deer; land managers and foresters are seeing some regeneration recovery in our forests; and farmers are telling us that they have seen less damage to their crops.

"We have reduced deer herds in many of our more rural Wildlife Management Units, and our focus has been to stabilize deer herds in those areas over the past two hunting seasons. However, we continue to focus our efforts on reducing deer impacts in our most urbanized WMUs - 2B, 5C and 5D - in the southwestern and southeastern portions of the state."

For more information, visit the Game Commission’s Deer Management Program webpage.

NewsClip: PA Court Rejects Deer Management Lawsuit

Outdoors: Time for Another Battle in Deer War


1/12/2007

Go To Preceding Article     Go To Next Article

Return to This PA Environment Digest's Main Page