Senate OKs Resolution on Study of Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Costs
|
|
The Senate this week unanimously approved Senate Resolution 224 (Vance-R-Cumberland) that requires a third-party study of the costs for sewage treatment facilities to fulfill the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy “Just this week the Chesapeake Bay Foundation joined those requesting that the state assist with the costs of implementing the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy,” Sen. Vance said. “In addition, the Department of Environmental Protection has given a variety of figures about what it will cost municipalities to do necessary upgrades. We need to find out what the true costs are before funding sources can be more thoroughly discussed.” Senate Resolution 224 directs the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to review estimates of the costs that sewage treatment facilities will incur to comply with the CBTS. “The Legislative Budget and Finance Committee has an excellent reputation for doing these type of studies in a nonpartisan, objective way,” Sen. Vance added. “I have full confidence in the work of their staff.” These pollutants can come from a variety of sources: agriculture, stormwater runoff, wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, forested lands and atmospheric deposition. The Senate Republican Policy Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the cost of the Chesapeake Bay cleanup on February 21 in Harrisburg. (See separate story.) NewsClips: Vance Bay Impact Bill Gets OK Senate Calls for Study of Chesapeake Bay Cleanup Costs Groups Push Funding to Revive Polluted Waterways Lock Haven Bills to Skyrocket Under Chesapeake Bay Requirements Chesapeake Bay Cleanup Funding Sought Plants to Keep Nutrients at Bay, But Cost a Concern State Asked to Fund Sewer Plant Upgrades Passing the Buck on Water Quality Danville Challenges Sewer Upgrade Requirements
Links: Chesapeake Bay Foundation Urges Environment Be Given More Priority County Conservation Districts Concerned With Gov. Rendell’s Proposed Budget PA Farm Bureau Concerned About Budget Cuts to Vital Programs |
|
2/15/2008 |
|
Go To Preceding Article Go To Next Article |